{"id":14192,"date":"2011-11-10T06:47:39","date_gmt":"2011-11-10T11:47:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/?p=14192"},"modified":"2011-11-10T06:47:39","modified_gmt":"2011-11-10T11:47:39","slug":"abu-dhabi-f1-talks-more-important-than-race","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/formula-1\/abu-dhabi-f1-talks-more-important-than-race\/","title":{"rendered":"Abu Dhabi F1 talks &#8216;more important than race&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Martin Whitmarsh would be happy if the forthcoming negotiations over F1&#8217;s future results in the teams owning a slice of the sport.<\/p>\n<p>With the bitter political battle of 2009 still in memory, many of F1&#8217;s paddock players are looking nervously towards the expiry next year of the crucial tripartite Concorde Agreement.<\/p>\n<p>As ever, everyone wants a bigger slice of the lucrative pie.<\/p>\n<p>But this time around, talk of a &#8216;breakaway&#8217; series is unlikely to be used as a weapon &#8212; perhaps because the existing agreement now forbids it.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, the big talking point could be the teams&#8217; interest in joining up with CVC and Bernie Ecclestone as actual co-owners of the commercial rights.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If you are trying to create partnership in most businesses then a bit of cross equity is useful,&#8221; confirmed Whitmarsh, the McLaren team principal and also chairman of FOTA, the 11-team alliance.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;At the moment the teams contract for a finite period to the Concorde Agreement.\u00a0 If teams were equity holders &#8211; even on a small scale &#8211; then it encourages all stakeholders and potential investing partners that you have some continuity,&#8221; he added.<\/p>\n<p>It goes without saying, however, that in the highly competitive world of formula one, it is perhaps surprising that FOTA has essentially stayed together for so long.<\/p>\n<p>That could be about to change, with a burgeoning disagreement over the voluntary cost-cutting resource restriction agreement (RRA) heading for crucial talks this weekend in Abu Dhabi.<\/p>\n<p>Writing in O Estado de S.Paulo newspaper, Livio Oricchio said the meeting is arguably &#8220;more important than the grand prix&#8221; this weekend.<\/p>\n<p>Mercedes&#8217; Ross Brawn agrees that the body&#8217;s continuing harmony is &#8220;essential&#8221; and &#8220;everyone should do everything to keep it together&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>HRT has already left FOTA, and the temptation for others to join the small Spanish team might be high, with F1 chief executive Ecclestone famous for &#8216;divide and conquer&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If the small teams want the money split 12 ways equally then that is unrealistic,&#8221; Whitmarsh told the Financial Times.\u00a0 &#8220;But it falls on all of us to get to something that is fair and equitable.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;(Without) the small teams we are in trouble.\u00a0 We need them to race against and we would be diminished if we lost them.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a challenge and it is something that can be preyed upon in a negotiation,&#8221; he added.\u00a0 &#8220;Bernie is very, very good at that.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The obvious tactic for FOTA, then, is to stick together.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We wouldn&#8217;t be very smart if we didn&#8217;t,&#8221; Whitmarsh insisted, urging F1&#8217;s strong personalities to &#8220;overcome our respective egos, leave the past behind and look forward&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>And a joker in the pack is the Jean Todt-led FIA, who lease the commercial rights to Ecclestone\/CVC but do not otherwise have a stake.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We do not want to grab the rights back.\u00a0 But we definitely want an input in these rights in some sort of capacity,&#8221; confirmed FIA spokesman Norman Howell.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #888888;\"><em>\u00a9 RIF | GMM<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Martin Whitmarsh would be happy if the forthcoming negotiations over F1&#8217;s future results in the teams owning a slice of the sport. With the bitter political battle of 2009 still in memory, many of F1&#8217;s paddock players are looking nervously towards the expiry next year of the crucial tripartite Concorde Agreement. As ever, everyone wants &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,2637,5262,5300,5340,118,284,491,35],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14192"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14192"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14193,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14192\/revisions\/14193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}