{"id":14923,"date":"2012-01-13T07:17:51","date_gmt":"2012-01-13T12:17:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/?p=14923"},"modified":"2012-01-13T07:17:51","modified_gmt":"2012-01-13T12:17:51","slug":"2012-ferrari-has-ugly-bump-on-nose","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/formula-1\/2012-ferrari-has-ugly-bump-on-nose\/","title":{"rendered":"2012 Ferrari has ugly &#8216;bump&#8217; on nose"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Part of what makes the 2012 Ferrari &#8220;not pretty&#8221; is a conspicuous bump on its nose, it is believed.<\/p>\n<p>The famous team&#8217;s bosses Stefano Domenicali and Luca di Montezemolo used descriptions including &#8220;not pretty&#8221; and &#8220;lousy&#8221; when describing the physical appearance of the unlaunched new machine, codenamed 663.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not that pretty, because the shape defined by the technical regulations does not leave much scope&#8221;, admitted Domenicali.<\/p>\n<p>It is believed he is referring to regulation tweaks for 2012 that will reduce the height of the noses, to improve driver safety in the event of crashes.<\/p>\n<p>But the maximum height of the dash bulkhead remains the same, meaning that Ferrari&#8217;s low nose tapers sharply where it meets the front of the monocoque.<\/p>\n<p>Some sources claim to have seen drawings or images of Ferrari&#8217;s unnamed 2012 car, but Fernando Alonso on Thursday insisted the car &#8220;is quite similar&#8221; in physical appearance to last year&#8217;s contender.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The rules have been clarified a bit in the last two years with the result that all the cars look more and more alike,&#8221; Spanish reporters quote him as saying.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #888888;\"><em>\u00a9 RIF | GMM<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Part of what makes the 2012 Ferrari &#8220;not pretty&#8221; is a conspicuous bump on its nose, it is believed. The famous team&#8217;s bosses Stefano Domenicali and Luca di Montezemolo used descriptions including &#8220;not pretty&#8221; and &#8220;lousy&#8221; when describing the physical appearance of the unlaunched new machine, codenamed 663. &#8220;It&#8217;s not that pretty, because the shape &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[3],"tags":[5262,93,5340,148,3542,150],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14923"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14923"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14923\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14924,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14923\/revisions\/14924"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}