{"id":18071,"date":"2013-04-05T07:05:51","date_gmt":"2013-04-05T11:05:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/?p=18071"},"modified":"2013-04-05T07:05:51","modified_gmt":"2013-04-05T11:05:51","slug":"engine-makers-to-get-extra-january-test-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/formula-1\/engine-makers-to-get-extra-january-test-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Engine makers to get extra January test &#8211; report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>F1&#8217;s engine manufacturers have reportedly won the battle for an extra pre-season test for 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Apparently against the resistance of some teams, the engine suppliers had argued that &#8211; given the workload and complexity of preparing for the new V6 rules &#8211; next year&#8217;s pre-season test period should be extended.<\/p>\n<p>Writing in Speed Week, correspondent Rob La Salle said the manufacturers have indeed won the argument for a fourth test, possibly in the Middle East.<\/p>\n<p>La Salle quoted Renault&#8217;s Rob White as saying a proposal is on the table for a January test, in addition to the usual three tests in February.<\/p>\n<p>White said an earlier test, perhaps at the tail end of this year, is not feasible.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;To be at a test track for example in October, the engines would have to be built in September.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There is a lead time of three months, so you would have to decide upon the specification in May.\u00a0 We would prefer to have that time on the test benches instead.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;With some components, we are still in the design phase.\u00a0 A test in October would be just too early.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Ferrari, a staunch critic of F1&#8217;s now severely limited track testing, will be happy with the news of an extra pre-season test.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The testing situation is ridiculous,&#8221; team boss Stefano Domenicali told the latest edition of the British magazine F1 Racing.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;With the other teams, we&#8217;ll try to convince them that we need to find another balance &#8212; and I am positive we can find a solution.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #888888;\"><em>\u00a9 RIF | GMM<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>F1&#8217;s engine manufacturers have reportedly won the battle for an extra pre-season test for 2014. Apparently against the resistance of some teams, the engine suppliers had argued that &#8211; given the workload and complexity of preparing for the new V6 rules &#8211; next year&#8217;s pre-season test period should be extended. Writing in Speed Week, correspondent &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[3],"tags":[5262,93,5340,1090,150],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18071"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18071"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18071\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18072,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18071\/revisions\/18072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}