{"id":22133,"date":"2014-06-02T07:00:13","date_gmt":"2014-06-02T11:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/?p=22133"},"modified":"2014-06-02T07:00:13","modified_gmt":"2014-06-02T11:00:13","slug":"all-new-fuel-flow-sensor-to-debut-in-2014-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/formula-1\/all-new-fuel-flow-sensor-to-debut-in-2014-report\/","title":{"rendered":"All-new fuel flow sensor to debut in 2014 &#8211; report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>F1 looks set to abolish the troublesome Gill fuel flow sensor.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this season, the sensor was at the centre of Daniel Ricciardo&#8217;s disputed Melbourne disqualification, with Red Bull arguing it was unreliable and inaccurate.<\/p>\n<p>Now, the specialist magazine Racecar Engineering reports in its latest issue that an alternative sensor &#8220;is in the final stages of development&#8221;, and could even make its debut later in 2014.<\/p>\n<p>The new sensor is reportedly being developed by a company called Sentronics, with the involvement of Hyspeed, who initially worked with Gill on the current F1 sensor.<\/p>\n<p>The Gill-Hyspeed collaboration, however, ended last year, leaving Hyspeed to start work on the new solution.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We remain convinced that the ultrasonic time-of-flight principle is the best way of measuring fuel flow on board a race car,&#8221; said managing director Neville Meech, who formerly worked for Gill.<\/p>\n<p>He said the Sentronics sensor, called the &#8216;Flowsonic&#8217;, is a &#8220;compact and robust unit with the minimum of materials and parts, and hence less to go wrong&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>It also weighs just 250 grams, half the maximum permitted by the FIA, Racecar Engineering added.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a9 RIF | GMM<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>F1 looks set to abolish the troublesome Gill fuel flow sensor. Earlier this season, the sensor was at the centre of Daniel Ricciardo&#8217;s disputed Melbourne disqualification, with Red Bull arguing it was unreliable and inaccurate. Now, the specialist magazine Racecar Engineering reports in its latest issue that an alternative sensor &#8220;is in the final stages &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[3],"tags":[4954,5262,5300,5340,4950,4691,4952,4955,407,129,4951,4953],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22133"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22133"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22133\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22134,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22133\/revisions\/22134"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}