{"id":25559,"date":"2014-11-09T08:23:06","date_gmt":"2014-11-09T13:23:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/?p=25559"},"modified":"2014-11-09T08:23:06","modified_gmt":"2014-11-09T13:23:06","slug":"mercedes-rivals-warn-freeze-could-end-completely","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/formula-1\/mercedes-rivals-warn-freeze-could-end-completely\/","title":{"rendered":"Mercedes rivals warn &#8216;freeze&#8217; could end completely"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>With progress also having stalled over the small teams&#8217; touted &#8216;fighting fund&#8217;, Toto Wolff emerged from a big team bosses meeting at Interlagos on Saturday with little news.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Nothing was agreed on anything,&#8221; he told reporters.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The situation is unchanged on everything, the money side, engine side.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As ever, there is always more to it in formula one.<\/p>\n<p>The recent history of the engine &#8216;freeze&#8217; saga is that while dominant Mercedes has been making noises of potential compromise, the German camp is still at loggerheads with disgruntled rivals Ferrari and Renault.<\/p>\n<p>The latter two are railing against the current engine homologation rules, or the so-called &#8216;freeze&#8217; that is designed to keep speeds and costs down by limiting the amount of performance development engine makers can do within a season.<\/p>\n<p>But that rule is also threatening to freeze in Mercedes as the likely championship favourite for years to come.<\/p>\n<p>But even between 2014 and 2015, the engine suppliers are allowed to change a maximum of 48 per cent of their current designs, which is then re-&#8216;frozen&#8217; in February.<\/p>\n<p>Until now, Renault and Ferrari have argued that the development deadline should now be extended until July.<\/p>\n<p>But in the last day or two, it has emerged that they also want the percentage of possible changes &#8211; represented by a complex &#8216;token system&#8217; &#8211; increased by almost a further 20 per cent.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s too expensive,&#8221; argue Mercedes&#8217; Wolff and team chairman Niki Lauda, according to Auto Motor und Sport.<\/p>\n<p>For now, Mercedes&#8217; lack of agreement simply means nothing will change for 2015, as warned by Wolff as he departed the Interlagos meeting.<\/p>\n<p>But more serious games are at play.<\/p>\n<p>It emerges that while unanimity is required for 2015, a simple majority vote is enough for a year later &#8212; and Mercedes, Renault and incoming supplier Honda obviously have the numbers on their side.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Mercedes&#8217; opponents are threatening that engine development will be completely opened up (in 2016),&#8221; Germany&#8217;s Auto Motor und Sport reports.<\/p>\n<p>An insider declared: &#8220;Then there will be war.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>With Caterham and Marussia already gone, and struggling Lotus, Force India and Sauber now complaining loudly about costs, opening up engine development would be a major move for F1.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The fact is that with the new (V6) engine, which from a technology perspective is a great thing, the costs were passed on to all the teams,&#8221; Lotus&#8217; Gerard Lopez argues.<\/p>\n<p>He says Lotus alone spent up to $60 million on buying a Renault engine in 2014 and developing the complex systems around it.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If we unfreeze the engines now, which is the next topic that is coming up &#8230; at the end of the day not taking decisions has had an immediate impact on the sport in the last couple of weeks with two teams disappearing,&#8221; Lopez warned.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a9 RIF | GMM<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With progress also having stalled over the small teams&#8217; touted &#8216;fighting fund&#8217;, Toto Wolff emerged from a big team bosses meeting at Interlagos on Saturday with little news. &#8220;Nothing was agreed on anything,&#8221; he told reporters. &#8220;The situation is unchanged on everything, the money side, engine side.&#8221; As ever, there is always more to it &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":24923,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[3],"tags":[2059,5262,93,5340,58,3400,598,55,5359],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25559"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25559"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25559\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25560,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25559\/revisions\/25560"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24923"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25559"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}