{"id":26354,"date":"2014-12-20T00:20:21","date_gmt":"2014-12-20T05:20:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/?p=26354"},"modified":"2014-12-19T21:22:13","modified_gmt":"2014-12-20T02:22:13","slug":"ecclestone-determined-to-change-2016-engine-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/formula-1\/ecclestone-determined-to-change-2016-engine-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"Ecclestone determined to change 2016 engine rules"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bernie Ecclestone has confirmed reports he remains determined to shake up F1&#8217;s engine rules.<\/p>\n<p>We reported that, at Thursday&#8217;s Strategy Group meeting in Geneva, the F1 supremo did propose to scrap the turbo V6 regulations for 2016 but it did not produce a &#8220;definitive result&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>But according to Germany&#8217;s Auto Motor und Sport, he made clear his strong desire for &#8216;louder, more powerful and cheaper&#8217; engines for 2016, perhaps to be normally aspirated, 1000 horse power and costing just 10 million euros for a customer supply.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;An expert group must deliver results (on the proposal) by the end of January,&#8221; claimed correspondent Michael Schmidt.<\/p>\n<p>But Ecclestone told The Independent newspaper late on Friday that at the meeting, in emerged that in fact &#8220;Nobody wants to change the engines, they are all happy&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not exactly great progress,&#8221; he is quoted by F1 business journalist Christian Sylt.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The next step is that we will have another meeting in January and the teams will have to come back with something positive.\u00a0 If they don&#8217;t, we will say this is how it has got to be,&#8221; Ecclestone added.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a9 RIF | GMM<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bernie Ecclestone has confirmed reports he remains determined to shake up F1&#8217;s engine rules. We reported that, at Thursday&#8217;s Strategy Group meeting in Geneva, the F1 supremo did propose to scrap the turbo V6 regulations for 2016 but it did not produce a &#8220;definitive result&#8221;. But according to Germany&#8217;s Auto Motor und Sport, he made &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":22937,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,5262,5340,4956],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26354"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26354"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26354\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26355,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26354\/revisions\/26355"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}