{"id":5915,"date":"2010-06-01T19:04:45","date_gmt":"2010-06-01T23:04:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/?p=5915"},"modified":"2010-06-01T19:04:45","modified_gmt":"2010-06-01T23:04:45","slug":"lotus-plays-down-force-india-spy-scandal-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/formula-1\/lotus-plays-down-force-india-spy-scandal-reports\/","title":{"rendered":"Lotus plays down Force India &#8216;spy scandal&#8217; reports"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lotus on Tuesday distanced itself from claims it is involved in a new formula one &#8216;spy scandal&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->It emerged last November that Force India was concerned a wind tunnel model of new team Lotus&#8217; 2010 car strongly resembled its own 2009 racer.<\/p>\n<p>Silverstone based Force India once worked at the Aerolab facility, leaving behind a scale wind tunnel model.<\/p>\n<p>Mike Gascoyne, originally with Force India, now works with Lotus, the Malaysian-backed outfit that also made use of the Aerolab facility.<\/p>\n<p>Aerolab initially hit back at the reports, revealing that it was in fact pursuing Force India in the courts after &#8220;serious and persistent breaches of contract&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>And Gascoyne subsequently said: &#8220;It is entirely between the wind tunnel operator and the other team.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It has emerged this week that legal action has been initiated by Force India against Aerolab, with Lotus pulled in as a co-defendant.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These proceedings do not allege any wrong doing on the part of Lotus Racing,&#8221; a spokesman for Lotus Racing said on Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Aerolab &#8230; vigorously denies any wrongdoing and has provided Lotus Racing with a full indemnity in relation to the claim,&#8221; he added.<\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"color: #c0c0c0;\">\u00a9 RIF|GMM<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lotus on Tuesday distanced itself from claims it is involved in a new formula one &#8216;spy scandal&#8217;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[3],"tags":[5262,576,5340,912,305],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5915"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5915"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5915\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5916,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5915\/revisions\/5916"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.racinginfocus.com\/rif\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}